Went rather well. After doing a trigger job (3.75lbs. Thanks to Dan Burwell) I reinstalled the rear sight, and didn't get a chance to sight in. Just eye balled it.
I shot the M&P as my second gun in a local IDPA match so the score didn't count. That's a shame too because I would have finished 3rd out of 35 shooters.
I have yet to find an accurate load for this gun. I shot precision 147's over 231 which only groups about 3" at 15 with some minor, periodically tumbling issues and flyers. They performed well though. I did change the oal and up the charge a bit with the batch I used. Didn't get to test them before the match either. Don't think it likes the heavier bullets. I'll be trying 124's next.
Anyway, given the circumstances I was very pleased. Having smaller hands I like the grip options, and the trigger better then my Glocks. I believe my splits were faster with the M&P too.
Can't wait to find a load it really likes!
Bill
BTW, now I know why J. Goloski, E. Langdon, Scott Warren , and a host of others are shooting the M&P
I shot the M&P as my second gun in a local IDPA match so the score didn't count. That's a shame too because I would have finished 3rd out of 35 shooters.
I have yet to find an accurate load for this gun. I shot precision 147's over 231 which only groups about 3" at 15 with some minor, periodically tumbling issues and flyers. They performed well though. I did change the oal and up the charge a bit with the batch I used. Didn't get to test them before the match either. Don't think it likes the heavier bullets. I'll be trying 124's next.
Anyway, given the circumstances I was very pleased. Having smaller hands I like the grip options, and the trigger better then my Glocks. I believe my splits were faster with the M&P too.
Can't wait to find a load it really likes!
Bill
BTW, now I know why J. Goloski, E. Langdon, Scott Warren , and a host of others are shooting the M&P