[rthomse]

I'm not new to the M&P series.I currently own a M&P 9,M&P 9C, M&P 45,and a 40 C. The 40 shot ok .just wasn't my thing. I have no better explination. I took it out to the 50 yard line and no kidding 5 shots in 5 inches strung vertically and to the right on a IALEFI Q target.MMMMMMMMMMM maybe I won't sell it

 

[YukonGlocker]

 

[rthomse]

just to clarify this was done from prone with a sandbag rest.

 

[243ww]

 

[243ww]

just to clarify this was done from prone with a sandbag rest.

Still sounds good to me

You think you got enough MP's there?? :wink:

 

[rthomse]

No a 40 full sized will be soon in my posession.I like them alot more than Glocks

 

[Walker]

Good Call...

 

[243ww]

Nice if you can get it! 8)

 

[Cap'n]

just to clarify this was done from prone with a sandbag rest.

Even prone I doubt I could see well enough with iron sights at 50 yards to shoot like that

 

[ront]

My experience was that I was FAR more accurate with my .40c than I was with the G27 that it replaced. The G27 is a fine gun, but I did not shoot it very well.



Ron

 

[newgunner]

dont get it

why own so many versions of the m&p when there are so many other good guns out there. It's like owning four different models of Hondas. etc. M&P is great but Id like to feel something different.

 

[rthomse]

Because I can

 

[JoeM&P]

nice shooting. You should own as many as you can/want it cant hurt to have a few spares

 

[Slick26]

I shoot my 9c better than I ever shot my P2k 40. And HK's are well-known for their recoil-soaking designs.



Won't say the M&P is more refined than the HK, but I sure shot it better. And its more comfortable. And that's all I care about.



Its a daily carry. Oh, and the M&P coming with 3 grips instead of 2... while a relatively small deal, ended up making a huge difference.