[ted1trading]

I just picked one of these up to use with my M&P9. I intend to use the paddle instead of the belt loops, although it came with both.



Seems to work fine, but it is awfully lightweight. That may be a blessing (lighter=better for carry) or a curse (if it breaks easily).



Has anyone here tested these holsters and care to comment??

 

[mbott]

I just picked one of these up to use with my M&P9. I intend to use the paddle instead of the belt loops, although it came with both.



Seems to work fine, but it is awfully lightweight. That may be a blessing (lighter=better for carry) or a curse (if it breaks easily).



Has anyone here tested these holsters and care to comment??

Like it as a belt holster. Hate it as a paddle holster.



--

Mike

 

[JBP55]

I have used the belt holster for a year, no problems with it or M&P 9.

 

[mad212]

used it for a year as a paddle and had no issues.. Now I iwb with a "bare assets"

 

[High_Speed]

I haven't got my ccw yet, so can't vouch for using it as a carry holster. But I've got one that I use for range work, and I love it. Drawing out of it feels very natural, and is extremely smooth for me. And it seems to be pretty darn sturdy to me.

 

[choochboost]

Had one but sold it. Didn't like the locking lever. Carrying concealed with this holster is difficult for most.

 

[The Fish]

Like it as a belt holster. Hate it as a paddle holster.



--

Mike[/quote]



I agree to the above quote.

Easy to get a good grip on pistol while still in holster.

Locking lever not a problem after a bit of practice.

Even wear concealed under an untucked shirt.

 

[mad212]

I practiced my draw with the lock and noticed my finger would slip into the trigger well during a fast draw, switch to iwb.

 

[gtmtnbiker98]

I have several Blackhawk CQC holsters and love them. I use them for IDPA and do not have any problems with the finger release. I like the CQC holsters for the M&P line since they also fit my Glocks.