[wcmaas]

Just got email that the April issue of Gun Tests magazine had a 9mm M&P sub-compact they ran through that got a "D" grade. Oh no! Lost out to the Sig P239 DAK and Glock 26.

 

[ront]

This thread is also talking about it. This is pretty much out of the norm as to what has been written about the M&P line. Nice first post!

http://mp-pistol.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=3236



Ron

 

[2xTap]

Just got email that the April issue of Gun Tests magazine had a 9mm M&P sub-compact they ran through that got a "D" grade. Oh no! Lost out to the Sig P239 DAK and Glock 26.

Joined today, posted today, first post was about this.

 

[wcmaas]

[quote name='wcmaas']Just got email that the April issue of Gun Tests magazine had a 9mm M&P sub-compact they ran through that got a "D" grade. Oh no! Lost out to the Sig P239 DAK and Glock 26.

Joined today, posted today, first post was about this.

[/quote]



Understand the rolleyes. No agenda here really. I admire the M&P line very much and one of that line will be my next .40 S&W. Sorry for a 1st post that looked like bashing. Not my intention.

 

[YukonGlocker]

I wasn't aware that there is a M&P sub-compact...

 

[wcmaas]

I wasn't aware that there is a M&P sub-compact...

Typo - really wanted to say Compact. Once again

 

[YukonGlocker]

No problem!! :wink: :wink:

 

[wcmaas]

Thanks YukonGlocker! Not off to a very good start am I?

 

[YukonGlocker]

You are off to a fine start.

Jump right in; and have fun.

 

[Walker]

Remember jump right off with both feet and you have a choice, sink or swim and your'e swimming just fine... :wink:

 

[johndoe1027]

whoa, easy on him there Yukon, he actually brought information from the outside world with him on his first post! (even if it was crappy info, he didn't write the article). And the compact M&P is very much the same size as glock and xd subcompacts. A M&P subcompact would be the size of a Keltec 380. WELCOME WCMAAS!!!!