MP-Pistol Forum banner

NEW Folding Carbine from Smith & Wesson: The FPC

2833 Views 65 Replies 15 Participants Last post by  ShipWreck
NEW Folding Carbine from Smith & Wesson: The FPC


  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 10 of 66 Posts
Looked it over. Neat the way it folds. Neat the way it has mag. storage in the stock. Neat the way it uses M&P 15 round and larger magazines.

Seemed decently accurate after watching/listening to it hit 10 straight metal targets at 100 yds., standing position.

I've already got a couple 9MM carbines (AR variants that used the Colt style 32 round magazines.) I'm still gonna take a look at the specs/prices for this one.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
The one thing I wonder about is what a 16" barrel does to velocity. Does the velocity increase till the bullet leaves the barrel or does the friction between the barrel/bullet eventually start overcoming the rapidly decreasing gas pressure?

My AR15 looking carbine only has an 11.5" barrel with an XM177 (clone) flash suppressor pinned/welded to make it just over 16". So 11.5" of effective barrel. I use a slow burning powder in my reloads (Blue Dot) so it burns longer than the more common fast burning powders used in factory 9MM ammo.

Just mildly curious. Sixteen inch barrels with 9MM may be fine.
That's Star Wars, or Star Ship Troopers looking stuff right there.

I wonder what the increase in velocity does to the bullet expansion/penetration the newer 9MM hollow points are designed to do at the standard 9MM velocities. I'll have to look up some youtube videos to see if anyone has done some to test it.

You know, some of those older .357 magnum 125 grain hollow point loads were pushing up over 1400 fps out of the 4" revolver barrels. Kind of surprised me when I saw some of those chrono results.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I sometimes drive a car I'd rather not drive. But the coupes aren't always the right car for what we're doing. Not fun to drive but I may need to carry a bigger load or more people.

I sometimes shoot a rifle I'd rather not shoot. But the rifle may need a check after an optic change or some mods to the parts.

I sometimes watch a video made by someone who has aggravating habits. But if I learn from the stuff he/she is putting out there then it was worth it.

Sometimes the result is worth the irritation.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I'm a fan of consistency. My 9MM (bigger than pistol) guns are ARs. Same safeties, same way of dropping the magazines, same grips, same way to clear a malfunction, etc.

Try to do it with pistols, too. Even my striker fired pistols have thumb safeties. If I carry it, it's got thumb safeties. I no longer (for many years) carry a revolver. I stopped taking my M1A to the range (M1, too) because after using the safeties I'd find myself dropping the magazine on the AR15's next time I took to the range. That trigger finger has the need to do something after I stop pulling the trigger and with no safety in the trigger guard of the AR it finds it's way up to the mag. release and the mag. falls to the bench or ground.

I like that it uses the M&P pistol grip, magazine release, use of the pistol magazines and the storage method (I do wonder how the folks that value balance of a long arm will like loaded mags at the butt of the carbine, till you use them. Balance will change as you fire it. Being at the extreme rear it'll be more noticeable.

I don't like the safety. Different than what you carry - if you carry an M&P pistol. Under stress, you're in danger of either not using the safety (if you carry an M&P without thumb safeties) or wasting time looking for the thumb safety (if you carry M&Ps with thumb safeties.)

Just my opinion. Fun looking gun but I have my reservations.

If anyone here buys one please, please start a thread with pictures and your experiences using it. It would be helpful for all of us to hear from the people we "talk" with all the time about M&Ps vs. watching a reviewer on youtube. The more people that buy/use them and communicate about them the more things (good or bad) will be discovered.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Yeah, the AR15 goes with me these days. The desire/familiarity for the M1A rifle dates back to my time in the Army where I carried M14 TRW 1490317 for almost 4 years. Shot both in the Army. Carried both (M14 more than the M16A1) and I got called out for the hard shots or the possible hard shots. I'd get pulled aside, told my job was going to be different than the rest of the squad (or the platoon) and I needed to hit certain targets (all but once was training exercises and the other time we never left the barracks so it was more of an opportunity to consider what might happen/what I might have to do than anything else, Funny thing, I carried civilian style deer rifles, surplus US bolt action rifles and my M1A deer hunting in the mountains when I lived in WV. Not once did I have a deer show up to get shot unless I war carrying my M1A. I used to joke with my buddies that the deer would see the rifle, wonder what it was and then come walking up to see that strange looking rifle none of them had seen before. Curiousity (and a 150 grain bullet) killed the deer. AR15's are so much cheaper to shoot (and harder to clean) than the M1A or M1 Garand.

Sorry for going off topic. How do I remember the serial number after 40 plus years? We had an old Army armorer. You'd hand him your weapons card and he'd take it. Then he'd ask you which rifle was yours. When you told him "the one on the card" he'd say, "This is a piece of paper son, which rifle is yours?" Repeat that serial number every day for years and you'll remember it.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I find it "interesting" that people who prefer a pistol with no manual safety don't mind a long barreled pistol/carbine with a manual safety.

If you were a M&P fan who carried the full sized pistol (whichever size you prefer) could it cause a problem with the M&P PCC because that safety is there? Or would they carry it with the safety in the FIRE position? If it got moved to the SAFE position when carried in a bag would they develop the habit of always checking/moving the safety to the FIRE position if they ran it that way.

Got me thinking about that when I was checking the ammo in the old 1.0 PC 9MM. I was going through some magazines sorting out the ammo loaded with the Everglades 115 grain hollow points based on my range trip the other day and moving it into the 19 round mags. I carry with that 9MM pistol. It's got those nice big ambidextrous thumb safeties that are so different from the safety on the PCC (which is like my shotgun safeties, the ones that have a safety).

Really not trying to upset anyone, just wondering about the effects of training/muscle memory/stress when two things that similar are just a tiny bit different.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
As the man said, when things go bad you really don't have have time to think about what you're doing/going to do. You react the way you've been trained to react.

Do you take your eyes off the road to mess with your radio in the car/truck? Or do you just reach down (since you've done it so many times before) and your hand/fingers know exactly where the knob/button is and what you have to do to make the changes you want to make? I hope not.

When you drop a magazine and insert another do you have to think about which finger to use? Do you take your eyes off the surroundings to look for the magazine release button? Do you have to think about where the spare mags. are? Do you have to look at them to grab one? Do you have to take a moment to look at the pistol to insert the magazine? Do you have to think about how to get the pistol to chamber that top round in the magazine? I hope not.

If you've trained you just do it. Your mind and eyes should be insuring you are aware of what is around you so you can respond to any other threats.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 3
They are a neat (and often repeated) idea for those who'd like a longer, more accurate gun to go along with their handgun. Not only does it use the same ammo, it uses the same magazines. If you carry a full sized M&P 9MM all the magazines on your belt, in your bag, on the stock of that gun fit both guns you're carrying/taking with you.

I guess there was some engineering reason for the difference in safeties between it and the pistols. The safeties don't block the striker or sear on the pistols. They block trigger bar movement so it can't move the sear and release the striker.
I have a couple 9MM AR types. If I stop to think about it I might be able to say the carbine kicks more than a .223 caliber carbine, but I'd have to have both laying on the bench and shoot both, one after the other, to say for sure.

Rick, are you on blood thinners? I take coumadin every day for a condition called Factor V Leiden. My blood clots too quickly, too easily (got a clot in my lower right leg - why they checked and found the hereditary condition). I've come back from the range, pulled my shirt off and found a bruise on my right shoulder (the same pattern as the little bumps on the back of the carbine buttstock - wild looking bruise for a couple days).

I look at a 9MM carbine as an intermediate range gun. More accuracy/velocity out past a pistol's normal range, but it's not in the same class as a .223/5.56X45 carbine.

Should allow the shooter to be more accurate/precise past normal handgun ranges and carry more ammo than the majority of handguns.

Mine won't fold up and go into a case like the S&W will.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 1
1 - 10 of 66 Posts
Top