Joined
·
468 Posts
I also posted this elsewhere in my thread about the possibility of the new M&P22 2.0 Compact (that doesn't look like it's going to happen).
I don't own any Taurus guns, and don't have any strong opinions on them either way.
Taurus TX22 -
https://www.guns.com/news/2019/01/24/the-taurus-tx22-is-a-striker-fired-pistol-dedicated-to-rimfire
https://americanhandgunner.com/handguns/taurus-tx22-love
This .22 is different in that it's striker-fired and doesn't have a fixed barrel. Full size, 16+1 capacity. Looks to be designed and manufactured in the U.S. $359 List.
Haven't seen the grip angle listed, but it looks like the "normal" 18 degrees (1911) and not the Glock's 22 degrees - which is good.
I was ready to pull the trigger on a M&P22 Compact, but may wait until these are out to see how they compare. My biggest issue with the M&P22 Compact is inconsistent accuracy and rough rifling. Not sure about the reduced size (87.5% of the standard size).
Please post any range tests or comparisons you may find.
Thanks!
I don't own any Taurus guns, and don't have any strong opinions on them either way.
Taurus TX22 -
https://www.guns.com/news/2019/01/24/the-taurus-tx22-is-a-striker-fired-pistol-dedicated-to-rimfire
https://americanhandgunner.com/handguns/taurus-tx22-love
This .22 is different in that it's striker-fired and doesn't have a fixed barrel. Full size, 16+1 capacity. Looks to be designed and manufactured in the U.S. $359 List.
Haven't seen the grip angle listed, but it looks like the "normal" 18 degrees (1911) and not the Glock's 22 degrees - which is good.
I was ready to pull the trigger on a M&P22 Compact, but may wait until these are out to see how they compare. My biggest issue with the M&P22 Compact is inconsistent accuracy and rough rifling. Not sure about the reduced size (87.5% of the standard size).
Please post any range tests or comparisons you may find.
Thanks!