Two weeks ago I had opportunity to speak with an M&P Tech Support rep on the phone. A week later I spoke with an M&P field marketing rep who was demonstrating the M&P pistol line at a big local firearms dealer.
I inquired of both men regarding the LACK of an M2.0 version of the 12rnd 9C.
BOTH reps tried to sell me the same nonsense, saying, "We already HAVE released the new M2.0 version of the 9C." In both cases they claimed the recently released short-slide version of the Compact 9 (15rnd) is the "new and improved 9C."
I told them both that was BS. I noted how the pistol in question is nothing more than a short-slide Compact 9 - a pointless modification in terms of improving concealability. EVERYBODY knows that the most difficult aspect of a pistol to conceal is the grip. A longer grip prints more than a short grip does, and the 12rnd grip of the 9C is considerably shorter than the 15rnd grip of the Compact 9 - especially at the bottom/rear of the 9C grip where it makes the most difference.
Both men seemed disgruntled at my remarks. Fine. I'm "disgruntled" at being played for a fool. I've been waiting a loooong time for the M2.0 9C with thumb safety. Been carrying a Glock G26 in the meantime, which I do not like.
S&W has enormous resources in terms of R&D and market research. They KNOW the shorter 9C would serve many of us better for CCW than the Compact 9 does, SO WHY ARE THEY NOT BRINGING THE M2.0 9C TO MARKET?
The only reasons that make sense to me are:
1) Perhaps there's a huge inventory of the old 9C pistols that must be sold before releasing the improved M2.0, or
2) Perhaps S&W fears that an M2.0 9C will cut into sales of the Shield pistols, as well as sales of the old-style 9C.
What do YOU think?
Sorry to be "quasi-belligerent" in my very first post here, but MAN(!!!) I've been seeking a straight answer to this question for a long time.
I inquired of both men regarding the LACK of an M2.0 version of the 12rnd 9C.
BOTH reps tried to sell me the same nonsense, saying, "We already HAVE released the new M2.0 version of the 9C." In both cases they claimed the recently released short-slide version of the Compact 9 (15rnd) is the "new and improved 9C."
I told them both that was BS. I noted how the pistol in question is nothing more than a short-slide Compact 9 - a pointless modification in terms of improving concealability. EVERYBODY knows that the most difficult aspect of a pistol to conceal is the grip. A longer grip prints more than a short grip does, and the 12rnd grip of the 9C is considerably shorter than the 15rnd grip of the Compact 9 - especially at the bottom/rear of the 9C grip where it makes the most difference.
Both men seemed disgruntled at my remarks. Fine. I'm "disgruntled" at being played for a fool. I've been waiting a loooong time for the M2.0 9C with thumb safety. Been carrying a Glock G26 in the meantime, which I do not like.
S&W has enormous resources in terms of R&D and market research. They KNOW the shorter 9C would serve many of us better for CCW than the Compact 9 does, SO WHY ARE THEY NOT BRINGING THE M2.0 9C TO MARKET?
The only reasons that make sense to me are:
1) Perhaps there's a huge inventory of the old 9C pistols that must be sold before releasing the improved M2.0, or
2) Perhaps S&W fears that an M2.0 9C will cut into sales of the Shield pistols, as well as sales of the old-style 9C.
What do YOU think?
Sorry to be "quasi-belligerent" in my very first post here, but MAN(!!!) I've been seeking a straight answer to this question for a long time.